<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>fro's blog&#187; cute babies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frosblog.com/tag/cute-babies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frosblog.com</link>
	<description>a potpourri of random miscellanea</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s the cutest baby in the world?</title>
		<link>http://frosblog.com/2009/05/whos-the-cutest-baby-in-the-world/</link>
		<comments>http://frosblog.com/2009/05/whos-the-cutest-baby-in-the-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 14:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mixed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cute babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cutest baby on the planet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood babies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frosblog.com/2009/05/whos-the-cutest-baby-in-the-world/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now, before you start thinking that I&#8217;m full of myself, let me explain what this is really all about. In a blog post I made, I talked about the need for your site to actually be related to the links that point to it. One example I gave was cutest baby on the planet search [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, before you start thinking that I&#8217;m full of myself, let me explain what this is really all about.</p>
<p>In a blog post I made, I talked about the need for your site to actually be related to the links that point to it. One example I gave was cutest baby on the planet search phrase, versus the miserable failure search phrase.</p>
<p>In the past, searching for &#8220;miserable failure&#8221; brought up a completely unrelated web page. Due to Google&#8217;s new algorithm that does away with the &#8220;Google bomb&#8221; or &#8220;link bomb&#8221; effect, that is no longer the case.</p>
<p>My post discussed why this doesn&#8217;t work anymore.</p>
<p>In one of the comments on that post, Alex Newell suggested that I setup a site and try to get it to rank for the phrase &#8220;coolest baby on the planet&#8221;, using the site to test various linking strategies and methods, etc.</p>
<p>Thus my <a href="http://coolestguyontheplanet.org/coolest-baby.html">cutest baby on the planet</a> site was born.</p>
<p>What I am attempting to prove is that by following the directions Google gives in its Webmaster Guidelines, you can rank a site for a keyword phrase using 100% &#8220;white hat&#8221; methods.</p>
<p>In the pages of the site you will see outlined the methods I am using, and the progress I am making in implementing each of the steps from Google&#8217;s guidelines.</p>
<p>As of right now, the site is ranked #1 in Google for &#8220;cutest baby on the planet&#8221;, but I also want to be ranked #1 for &#8220;cutest baby on the planet&#8221;, so I&#8217;m still working on it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.julesschroom.com/">Shopping Tips</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frosblog.com/2009/05/whos-the-cutest-baby-in-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

